Thursday, February 25, 2010
Today's online shopping.
Thursday, February 18, 2010
Best cheap paper for inkjets

Conclusion? Staples Inkjet (UPC 718103037518) was the best. It was consistently flaw-free, had a pleasantly cooler color temperature than the rest (it made it seem brighter, unsure if it actually is), and produced the sharpest text. The HP All-in-One (UPC 764025207003) paper deserves an honorable mention, as it was also flaw-free, had a good standard color temperature and brightness, and produced the second sharpest text. I expected similar results from the Hammermill, as it uses the same “ColorLok” technology as on the HP paper, indicating the same chemical treatment of the paper is used, and indeed, they look very similar. What drops the Hammermill down a notch is a higher incidence of flaws in the sheets. The flaws were small, and many sheets were pristine, but still, it’s a negative. As for the heavier stock advantage over the HP (24lb vs HP’s 22lb), both failed to really block details from the other side showing through, so it’s not much of an advantage.
The cheapest “Eco” paper, 30% of which is recycled content, did alright for its price. Sure, it’s peppered with flaws, but it’s cheap. The Office Depot paper, also being 30% recycled content, was a bit of a disappointment, as its only advantage over the cheap paper was it being slightly thicker and slightly brighter. It had just as high of incidence of flaws.
The biggest disappointment, though, was the most expensive. The Epson Bright White Paper, which went over my 2 cents/page limit for this roundup (it cost 10.99 for a 500 pack), presented itself initially as a worthwhile upgrade. It comes in a box with loose plastic covering inside, rather than a tight plastic wrapper, and the paper is stacked pristinely, and it glides out easily. That’s it for the positive. The incidence of flaws was merely average. And that unique color you see in amongst all the test clippings? The scanner actually captured it rather well. It’s the grayest, dullest paper of them all. It’s also the worst for bleeding… as in, you don’t even need to look too closely to see just how badly the paper soaks up the ink.
Unfortunately, the Staples paper has a bitter-sweet victory. As can be clearly seen, none of the papers here today came close to laser quality on even the cheapest paper. I was able to get laser-like quality on the next rung up (10 - 25 cents per page) of papers, but that’s starting to get a bit ridiculous. Do note I did try fine tuning the print settings to try and get better quality out of the same papers, but was unable to get noticeably sharper results – it seems all paper in this bottom rung is doomed to some bleeding.
So, there’s a secondary conclusion here: inkjets are a poor value for day to day work (not that this is a surprise). In the long run, you’ll be spending more, and getting amateurish results while you’re at it.
Wednesday, February 3, 2010
What is gaming convenience worth to you?

Monday, February 1, 2010
Video card cooling ideas

If you read my post about getting rid of legacy ports on enthusiast motherboards, then you're on the same page as to my thoughts on single slot coolers on upper-midrange graphics cards (like the 8800GT/9800GT and the 4850). The problem is that there is no exhausting of the hot air outside the case. The reason is because the manufacturers insist on loading up that single back panel with outputs: almost always a 2xDVI + multi-analog out (on the upper-mid-range cards that is). Now, I understand the dual DVI jacks, and because those two take up so much room, there's no point that using that little extra for exhaust, so they throw on a useless multi-analog out to fill in the space. The reason I say useless is because they often neglect to include the adapter for component out. Even if the adapter is included, component is the "when-all-else-fails" of outputs to TV/Projectors from a computer (S-Video and composite are not even worth mentioning these days).
Again, like with the motherboards, I'm not saying ALL video cards should be legacy free, just some (and eventually, most). So, considering most users are still running a single monitor, replace at least one of the DVIs with a HDMI or Displayport, and drop the analog out, and voila, you have enough room for some exhaust.
Also, Taco Del Mar is yummy.
As for the dual-50mm fan idea, the Youtube video will give a better idea of what I mean, but in theory this design should make SLI/Crossfire setups more practical (for non-full-length cards), as every multi-card setup I've seen with dual-slot coolers leaves very little room for air between the cards (thus the first card runs hotter and louder).